Dispute Resolution


A Paperless Courtroom: Embracing the Use of Electronic Trials[139]

Sept. 23, 2016 – In this article, James Bunting, Chantelle Spagnola and Anisah Hassan discuss a number of innovative practices that were adopted by the parties and the court in the Husky v. Schad trial heard in the Ontario Superior Court (Commercial List) in late 2015 and show how the adoption of those practices…


The Journal Conversation: Sheila R. Block, LSM, ASM[140]

Sept. 23, 2016 – This is an edited version of the Young Advocates’ Standing Committee’s “Fireside Chat on Advocacy” at Campbell House on April 11, 2016. Download this article.


Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Sandra Forbes[141]

Aug. 15, 2016 – Davies partner Sandra Forbes has been recognized as one of this year’s “Top 25 Women in Litigation” by Benchmark Canada. This award is the result of months of careful research and deliberation by Benchmark Canada and an accolade that highlights her status as one of Canada’s leading litigators.

In the News

Resolute Responds to Greenpeace with a Lawsuit[142]

June 02, 2016 – Peter Mendell, for Resolute Forest Products, is quoted in the article “Resolute responds to Greenpeace with a lawsuit” published on May 31 on Ici Radio-Canada.ca. The article discusses the RICO lawsuit filed by Resolute in the State of Georgia against Greenpeace, which has accused Resolute of…


Ontario Court of Appeal Denies Leave to Appeal Nortel Allocation Decision[143]

May 04, 2016 – On May 3, 2016, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its decision (Leave Decision) denying leave to appeal from Justice Newbould’s allocation of the proceeds of sale of the remains of the Nortel Networks group of companies (Allocation Decision). The main points arising from the decision…


The OSC Releases Its Reasons for Decision In the Matter of an Application by The Catalyst Capital Group Inc.[144]

Apr. 26, 2016 – On April 25, 2016, the Ontario Securities Commission released its reasons for decision In the Matter of an Application by The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. As this is the first case in which the Commission has denied standing to a party to commence an application under the “public interest”…

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37